Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work introduces a decentralized mechanism for the fair and efficient allocation of limited community-central renewable energy sources (RESs) among consumers with diverse energy demand and risk attitude levels in an energy community. In the proposed non-cooperative game, the self-interested community members independently decide whether to compete or not for access to RESs during peak hours and shift their loads analogously. In the peak hours, a proportional allocation (PA) policy is used to allocate the limited RESs among the competitors. Conditions for the existence of a Nash equilibrium (NE) or dominant strategies in this non-cooperative game are derived, and closed-form expressions of the renewable energy demand and social cost are calculated. Moreover, a decentralized algorithm for choosing consumers’ strategies that lie on NE states is designed. The work shows that the risk attitude of the consumers can have a significant impact on the deviation of the induced social cost from the optimal cost as the latter derives by a centralized minimization with full access to all consumers information. Besides, the proposed decentralized mechanism with the PA policy is shown to attain a much lower social cost than one using the naive equal sharing policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: