OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, immunogenicity, and safety of the proposed biosimilar IBI305 with those of bevacizumab in healthy male subjects. DESIGN: A phase I, randomized, double-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China, from March 2017 to November 2017. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 100 healthy male subjects were enrolled, with 48 in the IBI305 group and 50 in bevacizumab group included in the final analysis. INTERVENTION: In a 16-week study course, participants were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous administration of either a single dose of 3 mg/kg IBI305 (n = 50) or bevacizumab (n = 50). OUTCOME MEASURES: ). The secondary endpoints include the other PK parameters, immunogenicity, and safety measurements. Furthermore, no apparent difference in adverse events was found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the similarity of PK, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of IBI305 to those of bevacizumab.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: