Although environmental researchers use many different sizes of respondent samples, few environmental studies provide statistical rationales for selecting those sizes. This article utilizes bootstrap analysis to calculate split-block correlations of preferences of randomly selected respondents to a variety of environmental stimuli. Two analytic methods were used, raw score ratings and comparative choice. Analysis showed split-block correlations of .90 and higher could be achieved with 25 to 30 respondents with rating protocols and 10 to 15 respondents with comparative-choice protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arthur E. Stamps (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: