The dispersion of copper adsorbed on a Ru(001) substrate has been investigated by using Fourier transform-infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (FT-IRAS) and carbon monoxide as a molecular probe. Copper films evaporated at 85 K show a drastically different CO adsorption behavior compared to annealed films and exhibit a variety of adsorption sites. Characteristic C–O stretching frequencies allow us to identify small copper clusters of 1–4 atoms (2138–2123 cm−1), two-dimensional (2120–2110 cm−1) and three-dimensional (2098 cm−1) copper aggregates. After annealing to 250 K copper films at sub- and monolayer coverages form well-ordered small two- and three-dimensional copper aggregates. Formation of the epitaxial monolayer or islands of copper (2082 cm−1) requires a surprizingly mild annealing temperature of 350 K. Further annealing to 540 K results in increasing domain size of the copper islands or annealing of defect sites of the epitaxial monolayer. Multilayer coverages of copper evaporated at 85 K exhibit C–O stretching frequencies found for high-index copper single crystal surfaces, e.g., (211) and (755). This indicates a large number of surface steps and protruding copper atoms associated with rough films. Annealing to 540 K results in a smooth copper layer with preferential (111) orientation (2075 cm−1). The vibrational data presented here for Cu–Ru(001) agree well with previous reports of CO adsorption on copper single crystals, supported or evaporated films, and matrix-isolated clusters. They further allow us to determine the dispersion of supported Cu–Pt and Cu–Ni catalysts from data in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffmann et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: