The upward revaluation of non‐current assets is a common feature of contemporary accounting in Australia. This paper presents a case against the practice. The effects of revaluations are examined and possible reasons why firms revalue are considered. It is argued that asset revaluation is theoretically unsound, being inconsistent with the accounting structure within which it occurs. It is concluded that there are significant costs but few obvious benefits associated with revaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderson et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: