Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-malignant airway stenoses remain major challenges in interventional pulmonology, particularly when long-term stenting is required. Although conventional silicone airway stents effectively restore patency, their standardized geometry often fails to accommodate patient-specific airway anatomy, leading to migration, granulation tissue formation, mucus plugging, and repeated bronchoscopic interventions that limit long-term tolerance and efficacy. Advances in high-resolution imaging and modeling, and additive manufacturing have enabled the emergence of patient-specific, 3D-engineered silicone airway stents, predominantly produced using mold-based approaches. Early clinical experience suggests that personalization improves anatomical congruence and mechanical stability, particularly in anatomically complex non-malignant disease. The strongest evidence supports their use in post-surgical and post-lung transplant anastomotic complications, where distorted anatomy and prolonged stenting magnify the limitations of conventional devices. Additional emerging indications include complex inflammatory or post-infectious bronchial stenoses, selected benign tracheal stenoses with anatomical distortion, and refractory airway fistulas requiring customized occlusion. This narrative review summarizes current design principles, workflow, and patient selection for patient-specific airway stents. While evidence remains limited, ongoing trials and technological advances may broaden clinical indications, contingent on standardized reporting, biomechanical validation, regulatory clarity, and comparative studies establishing long-term clinical and economic value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Villeneuve et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: