Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report reveals successful apneic tracheal stenting via femorofemoral venoarterial ECMO in critical COVID-19 airway obstruction, highlighting a strategy to prevent differential hypoxia.
Palliative tracheal stenting for severe central airway obstruction in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents a dual challenge: the imminent risk of acute asphyxia during anesthetic induction and the risk of viral transmission to healthcare professionals via aerosols. While extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can serve as a safety bridge to facilitate apneic interventions, conventional venovenous ECMO may not be feasible in patients with superior vena cava (SVC) compression. Femorofemoral venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) is an alternative; however, it carries a substantial risk of differential hypoxia, particularly in patients with poor native lung function. We report a case of a 41-year-old woman with COVID-19 pneumonia and critical tracheal stenosis (luminal diameter 2 mm) caused by mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Given the prohibitive risk of airway collapse and the need for aerosol containment, she underwent successful apneic tracheal stent placement under femorofemoral VA-ECMO support. This approach was employed because SVC compression precluded upper body cannulation, and differential hypoxia was managed using a multifaceted physiological strategy without circuit modification. A combination of high-flow ECMO, deep anesthesia, pharmacologic cardiac output suppression, and anemia correction effectively mitigated the risk of differential hypoxia. This case demonstrates that femorofemoral VA-ECMO is a safe and effective option for facilitating apneic high-risk airway procedures, simultaneously ensuring airway security and infection control when conventional strategies are insufficient. Further case accumulation is needed to determine the validity and generalizability of these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwamizu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: