Why the study?
Does prior antiplatelet use increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving reperfusion therapy?
Does prior antiplatelet use increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving reperfusion therapy?
Prior antiplatelet use does not appear to have a significant independent detrimental effect on outcomes or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with reperfusion therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prior antiplatelet use need not alter reperfusion decisions; supports adjusted models showing no independent outcome effect.
BACKGROUND: Thirty percent of ischemic stroke (IS) patients suffering from acute stroke are under antiplatelet therapy. AIMS: We evaluated whether prior antiplatelet use before intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA) or combined IV/IA therapy may be associated with worse outcomes and an increased intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) risk after reperfusion therapies. METHODS: We analyzed data from our patient registry (n = 874) and conducted a systematic review of previous observational studies. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who developed symptomatic ICH (sICH), defined in our registry per ECASS-II definition. RESULTS: We identified 43 previous reports that evaluated the impact of prior antiplatelet use on outcomes after reperfusion therapy in AIS patients. Prior antiplatelet use was found in 35% of AIS patients, eligible for reperfusion therapies and was associated with a worse vascular profile. In an unadjusted meta-analysis that included our registry data, prior antiplatelet use was associated with more sICH per ECASS-II definition (OR, 1.78 (95% CI, 1.48-2.13), and less favorable outcome (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98). However, in multivariate analyses conducted in our registry showed that prior antiplatelet use was not associated with worse outcome (P > 0.23); and in the systematic review, only 3 studies reported a slight, but significant adjusted increase in sICH risk, of whom one had conflicting results according to sICH definition. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest no significant detrimental effect of prior antiplatelet use in AIS patients treated by IV, IA or combined IV/IA therapy. Further studies are needed to assess the specific impact of different and cumulative antiplatelet agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meseguer et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: