Why the study?
Large behavioral studies such as the U.K. Biobank use activity trackers without optical sensors and lack heart rate data, prompting investigation into IMU-only heart rate estimation via ballistocardiograms.
Does a frequency-based method using wrist-worn accelerometer data accurately estimate heart rate during sleep compared to ECG?
Does a frequency-based method using wrist-worn accelerometer data accurately estimate heart rate during sleep compared to ECG?
A novel frequency-based method for estimating heart rate from wrist-worn accelerometers during sleep achieves high accuracy, potentially enabling retrospective heart rate analysis in large datasets lacking optical sensor data.
May enable retrospective HR analysis in large accelerometer cohorts; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Today's fitness bands and smartwatches typically track heart rates (HR) using optical sensors. Large behavioral studies such as the U.K. Biobank use activity trackers without such optical sensors and thus lack HR data, which could reveal valuable health trends for the wider population. In this paper, we present the first dataset of wrist-worn accelerometer recordings and electrocardiogram references in uncontrolled at-home settings to investigate the recent promise of IMU-only HR estimation via ballistocardiograms. Our recordings are from 42 patients during the night, totaling 310 hours. We also introduce a frequency-based method to extract HR via curve tracing from IMU recordings while rejecting motion artifacts. Using our dataset, we analyze existing baselines and show that our method achieves a mean absolute error of 0.88 bpm-76% better than previous approaches and the first to surpass established medical standards for heart rate monitors. Our results validate the potential of IMU-only HR estimation as a key indicator of cardiac activity in existing longitudinal studies to discover novel health insights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moebus et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: