This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We propose a methodology to perform process variation-aware device and circuit design using fully physics-based simulations within limited computational resources, without developing a compact model. Machine learning (ML), specifically a support vector regression (SVR) model, has been used. The SVR model has been trained using a dataset of devices simulated a priori, and the accuracy of prediction by the trained SVR model has been demonstrated. To produce a switching time distribution from the trained ML model, we only had to generate the dataset to train and validate the model, which needed ∼500 hours of computation. On the other hand, if 10 6 samples were to be simulated using the same computation resources to generate a switching time distribution from micromagnetic simulations, it would have taken ∼250 days. Spin-transfer-torque random access memory (STTRAM) has been used to demonstrate the method. However, different physical systems may be considered, different ML models can be used for different physical systems and/or different device parameter sets, and similar ends could be achieved by training the ML model using measured device data.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: