Cross-sectional ecological study modeling local vulnerability to COVID-19 in small areas, suggesting targeted interventions.
Identifying factors that affect the vulnerability of areas to COVID-19 infection is essential, as it helps to identify the locations or risk groups that require additional attention. While connectivity among regions is a crucial driver in the epidemic growth, it is also observed that differences amongst locations in the regions exist, with some locations impacted much more or much less when compared to the surrounding region. We aim to develop a statistical model for assessment of localities’ vulnerability to COVID-19 based on risk factors, which also accounts for the regional settlement of the virus. In this cross-sectional ecological study, to determine the local vulnerability to COVID-19 in small areas (Belgian statistical sector level) as compared to in the larger neighborhood (municipality level), we propose a model with the mean incidence decomposed into a local vulnerability component and a regional outbreak component. This is illustrated by analyzing the vulnerability of the Flemish and Brussels regions in Belgium during the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, from September 2020 to May 2021. We investigate three groups of risk factors: socio-demographic, socio-economic, and environmental factors. As data are incomplete, a sensitivity analysis is undertaken to check the stability of model estimates. Results for the period September to December 2020 show that sectors with a higher median income and a larger proportion of non-Belgian residents were less vulnerable to COVID-19, while sectors with a higher proportion of pensioners, a lower education level, and/or a higher black carbon level had a higher vulnerability. We present a simple yet efficient tool to identify areas with an increased vulnerability to COVID-19 in an outbreak setting. This can be helpful for policymakers to develop targeted public health interventions with localized lockdowns, enhanced testing and vaccination, and to plan resource allocations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: