Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This randomized study demonstrates structural results in the first-prime window, indicating significant advancements in algebraic computation methods.
We prove six structural results for the local Weil quadratic form Q_W^L on L^2(-L,L) in the first-prime window (half*log2 < L < half*log3), the minimal interval where only the prime n=2 contributes to the Weil explicit formula. Our main technical contribution (Theorem 5.1) is an algebraisation showing that the matrices J_ij(tau) and E_ij(tau) lie in Q[tau] and are computable without numerical quadrature. We also prove a pure-rational absorption certificate (Theorem 4.3): V + P2,7/20 >= (69/100)*V >= 0, machine-verified in Lean 4/Mathlib. We give an exact spectral description of Cb,L (Theorem 3.1), falsify Path A by explicit certified negative witnesses (Theorem 6.1), and identify the spectral mechanism: the Weil constant c_L ≈ 1.36527 acts as a global negative diagonal shift that Path A cannot overcome, while without it the {P_0, P_2} subspace is positive definite (Remark 6.2). We also correct an error in an earlier draft: the companion asymptotic for the off-diagonal entry K_L fails by a factor of 40 at L=7/20, invalidating the proposed flip-point formula theta_0 = 1 - c_2/kappa_edge inside the first-prime window (Remark 6.3). We prove the Path B Schur criterion (Theorem 5.3) and establish FP-0.35 (Theorem 7.3): lambda(7/20) > 0, using the certified Weil constant c_L(7/20) = log(2*pi*7/20) + gamma_E (from Suzuki arXiv:2606.09096 equation (4.5), Arb 256-bit certified). These results do not imply the Riemann Hypothesis. Supporting code and 124 automated tests at https://github.com/telleroutlook/weil-first-prime Version 1.7: Two new remarks added to §6 (Strict Falsification of Path A). Remark 6.2 gives the 2×2 spectral mechanism: the Weil constant c_L ≈ 1.36527 is the global negative shift that makes det(E^theta) < 0; without c_L the {P_0,P_2} subspace is positive definite. Remark 6.3 corrects an error in an earlier draft: the edge-mass asymptotic ⟨K_L P_0, P_2⟩ ~ c_2/kappa_edge fails by a factor of 40 at L=7/20, and the proposed flip-point formula theta_0 = 1 - c_2/kappa_edge has no algebraic relationship to the spectrum of q̃^theta. Abstract updated to reflect both corrections. No change to any theorem statement or conclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
TAO LIN (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: