This research extends proper display calculi for logics with non-analytic inductive axioms, suggesting broader applicability for logical frameworks.
Display calculi were introduced by Nuel Belnap in [3] as a natural extension of Gentzen’s sequent calculi, as a uniform and modular framework capable of encompassing broad classes of logics. In [28], the properly displayable (D)LE-logics are syntactically characterized as the logics axiomatised by analytic inductive axioms for any signature. We extend the framework of proper display calculi for LE-logics to include axiomatic extensions with axioms that are inductive but not necessarily analytic inductive. This class of axioms covers and properly extends all Sahlqvist axioms. The present framework takes inspiration from Schroeder-Heister’s calculus of Higher-Level Rules [32] and captures the whole acyclic fragment of the substructural hierarchy [7] when generalized to arbitrary signatures. We apply unified correspondence theory and the algorithm ALBA to uniformly generate analytic rules for the aforementioned axiomatic extensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domenico et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: