This article examines legitimacy perceptions of asymmetric fiscal decentralisation in Spain, implying significant regional impacts.
Key Points
The study aims to explore how perceptions of asymmetric fiscal decentralisation affect its legitimacy among regions in Spain.
Conducted elite interviews with finance department representatives from four Spanish autonomous communities: Andalusia, Extremadura, Murcia, and the Valencian Community.
Utilized survey data on public attitudes towards Spain’s territorial model.
Analyzed three dimensions of legitimacy: procedural legitimacy, systemic coherence, and distributive fairness.
Fiscal asymmetry is less accepted when perceived as unclear or unfair, with specific regional grievances identified.
Inadequate transparency in asymmetric arrangements tends to undermine the legitimacy of the broader decentralised system.
The presence of robust intergovernmental forums is crucial for maintaining legitimacy and stability.