This controlled theorem program deconstructs the transition to effective geometry and gravitational dynamics in discrete systems, highlighting key mathematical dependencies.
The Theory of Harmonic Field Resonance (THFR) employs a discrete architecture for generating a Kronecker macrograph. However, the transition from this discrete construction to smooth effective geometry, Lorentzian signature, and the infrared sector of General Relativity has not previously possessed a completed mathematical derivation. In particular, the growth of the finite graph representation through the recursive Kronecker construction AG⁽ᵏ⁾ = M(IAB, χ)⊗ k, with DG(k) = 11ᵏ, does not by itself establish the existence of a continuum limit. Exact hierarchical self-similarity of the microscopic construction requires a separate demonstration that its discrete and potentially fractal-spectral features become irrelevant to long-wavelength infrared-scale quantities. The purpose of this work is not to prove the existence of the continuum limit, but to formally decompose the previously underderived transition into a system of distinct, dependency-ordered, independently falsifiable mathematical obligations. At a schematic ontological level, the research program proceeds from pre-geometric relations through infrared equivalence, continuum organization, effective dimensionality, causal structure, Lorentzian geometry, and effective gravitational dynamics. The corresponding proof architecture introduces graph coarse-graining, measured Gromov–Hausdorff and Mosco convergence, Riemannian regularity, infrared spectral dimension, causal-orientation structure, Lorentzian metric emergence, and effective gravitational dynamics as separate theorem targets. The main result of this work is the construction of a controlled architecture of proof obligations, an explicit dependency graph, and a matrix of local falsifiability. Neither the existence of the continuum limit, nor four-dimensionality of the infrared sector, nor emergence of Lorentzian causality, nor Einstein dynamics is claimed here as proven.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vadym Semenov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: