Why the study?
Neural correlates of hypnosis remain incompletely characterized despite recognition of its clinical utility.
Does clinical hypnosis alter functional connectivity in large-scale brain networks?
Does clinical hypnosis alter functional connectivity in large-scale brain networks?
fMRI evidence suggests hypnosis alters functional connectivity between cortical and subcortical regions, enhancing top-down regulation, though methodological heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical hypnosis warrants cautious use amid unclear mechanisms; leaves open standardized fMRI protocols to clarify network connectivity.
Neural correlates of hypnosis remain incompletely characterized despite recognition of its clinical utility. Examining functional connectivity changes in large-scale brain networks during hypnosis can provide insights into cognitive control, dissociation, and self-awareness. This study aimed to review fMRI studies of hypnosis, qualitatively synthesize evidence regarding its impact on brain network connectivity, and offer recommendations for future research by identifying inconsistencies in existing literature and methodology. PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science and other databases were searched for fMRI studies on hypnosis. Peer-reviewed articles written in English were screened against eligibility criteria. 35 experimental studies met inclusion criteria (n=689 participants). The review found heterogeneous effects on network connectivity during hypnosis, with both increased and decreased connectivity reported depending on suggestions used. Evidence indicates potential therapeutic effects for pain and anxiety, but overall direct clinical support was limited. Preliminary findings suggest hypnosis impacts connectivity between salience/executive control networks, enhancing top-down regulation of interoception and affect. Reduced connectivity was reported within default mode regions involved in internal mentation like the posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus. While the literature exhibits variability in protocols and results, findings indicate that hypnosis exerts top-down influence on internal mentation, attentional control, and emotional processing through altering functional interactions between cortical and subcortical brain regions. Inconsistencies arising from methodological variations and study heterogenity constrain definitive conclusions. Addressing these limitations through standardized protocols and comparisons based on universal large scale brain network taxonomy would strengthen the evidence for neural signature of hypnosis and enhance its applicability in various contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duje Bralić (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: