Key result
Clinically indicated echocardiography in severe Covid-19 patients was associated with significantly higher mortality (44% vs 16%) and elevated cardiac biomarkers, suggesting it carries a negative prognostic value.
Why the study?
The cardiac effects of severe SARS-CoV-2 and the importance of echocardiography assessment and biomarkers required investigation.
Observational (n=69)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure, clinical indication for echocardiography and elevated cardiac biomarkers are associated with higher mortality, driven primarily by pulmonary hypertension rather than left ventricular dysfunction.
Objective We aimed to investigate cardiac effects of severe SARS-CoV-2 and the importance of echocardiography-assessment and biomarkers. Methods This is an observational study of the first patients admitted to intensive care due to SARS-CoV-2-respiratory failure. Thirty-four underwent echocardiography of which twenty-five were included, compared to forty-four non-echo patients. Exclusion was based on absence of normofrequent sinus rhythm and/or mechanical respiratory support. Biomarkers were analysed on clinical indication. Results Mortality was higher in the echo-compared to non-echo group (44 % vs. 16%, p<0.05). Right-sided parameters were not under significant strain. Tricuspid valve regurgitation velocity indicated how increased pulmonary pressure was associated with mortality (survivors: 2.51 ± 0.01 m/s vs. non-survivors: 3.06 ± 0.11 m/s, p<0.05), before multiple comparison-correction. Setting cut-off for pulmonary hypertension to 2.8 m/s generated p<0.01 using frequency distribution testing. Cardiac markers, high sensitivity cardiac troponin I and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, and D-dimer were higher in the echocardiography group. (hs-TnI (ng/L): echo : 133 ± 45 vs. non-echo: 81.3 ± 45, p<0.01; NT-proBNP (ng/L): echo: 2959 ± 573 vs. non-echo: 1641 ± 420, p<0.001; D-dimer (mg/L): echo: 16.1 ± 3.7 vs. non-echo: 6.1 ± 1.5, p<0.01) and non-survivor group (hs-TnI (ng/L): survivors: 59.1 ± 21 vs. non-survivors: 211 ± 105, p<0.0001; NT-proBNP (ng/L): survivors: 1310 ± 314 vs. non-survivors: 4065 ± 740, p<0.0001; D-dimer (mg/L): survivors: 7.2 ± 1.5 vs. non-survivors: 17.1 ± 4.8, p<0.01). Tricuspid regurgitation velocity was positively correlated with cardiac troponin I (r=0.93, r 2 =0.74, p<0.001). Conclusions These results suggest there is no negative effect on cardiac function in critical SARS-CoV-2. Pulmonary pressure appears higher amongst non-survivors indicating pulmonary disease as the driver of mortality. Echocardiography was more commonly performed in the non-survivor group, and cardiac biomarkers as well as D-dimer was higher in the non-survivor group suggesting they carry negative prognostic values. Trial registration number This is an observational study from patients included in “Clinical trials NCT04316884 ” Strength and limitations of this study - The patient cohort is recruited from consecutive patients admitted to the ICU in need of mechanical respiratory support independent of background which makes it relevant to clinical practice. - The echocardiographic image acquisition was carried out by hospital assigned agents on clinical indication, which makes the results applicable in a clinical setting. - Since the image acquisition was carried out on a clinical indication, the results may be skewed towards the false positive if applied to all Covid19 patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isackson et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Severe Covid-19 with respiratory failure (n=69). Clinically indicated echocardiography vs. No echocardiography assessment was evaluated on Mortality (p=0.011). Clinically indicated echocardiography in severe Covid-19 patients was associated with significantly higher mortality (44% vs 16%) and elevated cardiac biomarkers, suggesting it carries a negative prognostic value.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: