Key result
The relative amount of oral bacterial DNA in pericardial fluid was significantly associated with the severity of coronary artery disease (p=0.035).
Why the study?
Does the amount of oral bacterial DNA in pericardial fluid correlate with the severity of coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=22)
No
Does the amount of oral bacterial DNA in pericardial fluid correlate with the severity of coronary artery disease?
p-value: p=0.035
Oral bacterial DNA is detectable in pericardial fluid and its quantity correlates with the severity of coronary artery disease, suggesting a potential link between oral infections and cardiovascular pathology.
Oral bacterial DNA in pericardial fluid was associated with CAD severity; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: We recently reported that large amounts of oral bacterial DNA can be found in thrombus aspirates of myocardial infarction patients. Some case reports describe bacterial findings in pericardial fluid, mostly done with conventional culturing and a few with PCR; in purulent pericarditis, nevertheless, bacterial PCR has not been used as a diagnostic method before. OBJECTIVE: To find out whether bacterial DNA can be measured in the pericardial fluid and if it correlates with pathologic-anatomic findings linked to cardiovascular diseases. METHODS: Twenty-two pericardial aspirates were collected aseptically prior to forensic autopsy at Tampere University Hospital during 2009-2010. Of the autopsies, 10 (45.5%) were free of coronary artery disease (CAD), 7 (31.8%) had mild and 5 (22.7%) had severe CAD. Bacterial DNA amounts were determined using real-time quantitative PCR with specific primers and probes for all bacterial strains associated with endodontic disease (Streptococcus mitis group, Streptococcus anginosus group, Staphylococcus aureus/Staphylococcus epidermidis, Prevotella intermedia, Parvimonas micra) and periodontal disease (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, Fusobacterium nucleatus, and Dialister pneumosintes). RESULTS: Of 22 cases, 14 (63.6%) were positive for endodontic and 8 (36.4%) for periodontal-disease-associated bacteria. Only one case was positive for bacterial culturing. There was a statistically significant association between the relative amount of bacterial DNA in the pericardial fluid and the severity of CAD (p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Oral bacterial DNA was detectable in pericardial fluid and an association between the severity of CAD and the total amount of bacterial DNA in pericardial fluid was found, suggesting that this kind of measurement might be useful for clinical purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Louhelainen et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=22). Oral bacterial DNA in pericardial fluid was evaluated on Association between the relative amount of bacterial DNA in the pericardial fluid and the severity of coronary artery disease (p=0.035). The relative amount of oral bacterial DNA in pericardial fluid was significantly associated with the severity of coronary artery disease (p=0.035).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: