Key result
Bedside ATP test predicts AVNRT or AVRT induction with 93% positive predictive value.
Why the study?
Paroxysmal AVNRT and AVRT may elude clinical diagnosis, and it was postulated that the ATP test during sinus rhythm could identify patients with palpitations who have these arrhythmias and would benefit from EP evaluation.
Does a bedside adenosine triphosphate (ATP) test identify the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia (AVNRT or AVRT) in patients with palpitations of unclear etiology?
Observational (n=146)
Does a bedside adenosine triphosphate (ATP) test identify the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia (AVNRT or AVRT) in patients with palpitations of unclear etiology?
A bedside ATP test during sinus rhythm has a high positive predictive value (93%) for identifying AVNRT or AVRT in patients with palpitations of unclear etiology, helping to appropriately select patients for electrophysiologic evaluation and potential ablation.
Positive ATP test may aid EP referral decisions in unexplained palpitations; leaves open prospective validation of clinical utility.
OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the value of the "ATP test" (injection of adenosine triphosphate [ATP] during sinus rhythm) for identifying patients with palpitations of unclear etiology who actually have atrioventricular (AV) nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT) or AV re-entry tachycardia (AVRT). BACKGROUND: Because AVNRT and AVRT can be cured with radiofrequency ablation, documentation of spontaneous AVNRT or AVRT usually prompts referral for electrophysiologic (EP) evaluation. However, these paroxysmal arrhythmias may elude clinical diagnosis. We recently showed that administration of ATP during sinus rhythm often reveals dual AV node physiology or a concealed accessory pathway (AP) in patients with documented AVNRT or AVRT. Thus, we postulated that the ATP test could identify patients with palpitations who actually have AVNRT or AVRT and would therefore benefit from EP evaluation. METHODS: One hundred forty-six patients (54 with "palpitations without documented arrhythmias" and 92 with "documentation of arrhythmias of unclear mechanism") underwent a noninvasive ATP test. ATP was injected during sinus rhythm using 10 mg increments. The ATP test was considered positive when prospectively defined signs of dual AV node physiology or concealed AP were disclosed in the electrocardiogram. These findings were correlated with the results of EP evaluation. RESULTS: A positive ATP test predicted induction of AVNRT or AVRT with a positive predictive value of 93% (sensitivity 71%) but a negative predictive value of 37% (specificity 76%). CONCLUSIONS: A bedside ATP test identifies patients with palpitations who are likely to have AVNRT or AVRT (and who are therefore likely to benefit from EP evaluation) with a high positive predictive value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viskin et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Palpitations of unclear etiology (n=146). ATP test vs. Electrophysiologic (EP) evaluation was evaluated on Induction of AVNRT or AVRT. A bedside ATP test predicted the induction of AVNRT or AVRT with a positive predictive value of 93% (sensitivity 71%) and a negative predictive value of 37% (specificity 76%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: