Design
Editorial
Proposes the establishment of a comprehensive regional system of care for cardiovascular emergencies led by designated receiving centers to improve outcomes and manage costs.
I n 2007, there were Ϸ4 million visits to emergency depart- ments in the United States with a primary diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. 1 Current forecasts estimate that the direct medical costs for cardiovascular disease in the United States will triple by 2030 to $800 billion dollars. 2 Acute cardiovascular emergencies, including ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI/unstable angina, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), acute aortic dissection (AAD), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), stroke, and acute decompensated heart failure/cardiogenic shock, require rapid, complex, and resource-intensive care and confer a high risk of mortality.Regionalized systems of care enable patients with complex and urgent medical needs to be systematically directed to hospitals that can provide the highest level of clinical expertise and resources (ie, designated centers).Historically, trauma systems have used this paradigm with improved outcomes.There is a growing focus on regionalized medical care as a strategy to leverage limited resources, to manage cost, and to improve outcomes for other medical emergencies.National cardiovascular organizations have already published recommendations for the establishment of centers and regional systems of care for STEMI, 3-6 cardiac arrest, 7-9 and stroke.10,11 The purpose of this article is to propose the concept of a cardiovascular emergency system, ie, a comprehensive regional system of care for cardiovascular emergencies led by a designated cardiovascular emergency receiving center.Over the past decade, the Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital (MHI-ANW) has implemented regional systems of care for STEMI, 12 OHCA, 13 AAD, 14 non-STEMI, and AAA.These initiatives provide a demonstration of the clinical programs and supportive network that reflect the burgeoning framework of a cardiovascular emergency system.Informed by this work, we discuss the historical perspective of, rationale for, and proposed principal elements of a cardiovascular emergency system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: