Key result
JAK inhibitors linked to ~175% higher pulmonary embolism risk versus dupilumab in atopic dermatitis.
Why the study?
Do JAK inhibitors increase the risk of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events in patients with atopic dermatitis compared to dupilumab, methotrexate, and cyclosporine?
Cohort
Yes
Do JAK inhibitors increase the risk of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events in patients with atopic dermatitis compared to dupilumab, methotrexate, and cyclosporine?
In patients with atopic dermatitis, JAK inhibitors are associated with a significantly increased risk of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis compared to dupilumab and methotrexate, underscoring the need for thrombotic risk assessment.
INTRODUCTION: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are increasingly used for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). However, concerns have emerged regarding their cardiovascular safety profile, particularly the risk of thromboembolic complications. Evidence specific to AD populations remains sparse. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the real-world risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among patients with AD treated with JAK inhibitors relative to those treated with dupilumab, methotrexate and cyclosporine. METHODS: Using the TriNetX global database, we conducted three propensity score-matched analyses comparing AD patients initiating JAK inhibitors with those receiving dupilumab (n = 1006), methotrexate (n = 958) or cyclosporine (n = 948). The incidence of MI, stroke, PE and DVT over 3 years was assessed. RESULTS: The risk of PE (hazard ratio [HR], 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 6.38; p = 0.014) and DVT (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.14 to 5.64; p = 0.017) was significantly higher among patients treated with JAK inhibitors relative to dupilumab, with a risk difference of eight and nine additional cases of PE and DVT/1000 patients starting JAK inhibitors, respectively. Relative to methotrexate, JAK inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of DVT (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.14 to 5.08; p = 0.017), with a risk difference of seven additional cases/1000 patients starting JAK inhibitors. The risk of MI and stroke was not statistically elevated under JAK inhibitors in comparison to any of the comparators. CONCLUSIONS: JAK inhibitor use in patients with AD is associated with a slightly increased risk of PE and DVT compared to dupilumab and methotrexate. These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection and thrombotic risk assessment when prescribing JAK inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kridin et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atopic dermatitis. JAK inhibitors vs. Dupilumab, methotrexate, and cyclosporine was evaluated on Pulmonary embolism (PE) (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.38, p=0.014). In patients with atopic dermatitis, JAK inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism (HR 2.75; 95% CI 1.19-6.38) and deep vein thrombosis compared to dupilumab.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: