Key result
Elevated NT-proBNP is linked to ~2.3-fold higher 7-year mortality in elderly patients.
Why the study?
Natriuretic peptides were suggested to improve risk prediction in asymptomatic cohorts, prompting evaluation of NT-proBNP's prognostic value beyond traditional risk factors in unselected elderly primary care patients.
Does elevated baseline NT-proBNP (>300 pg/ml or 125-300 pg/ml vs <=125 pg/ml) predict all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality independent of traditional risk factors in unselected elderly primary care patients?
Cohort (n=6,382)
Yes
Does elevated baseline NT-proBNP (>300 pg/ml or 125-300 pg/ml vs <=125 pg/ml) predict all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality independent of traditional risk factors in unselected elderly primary care patients?
Elevated NT-proBNP levels strongly and independently predict 7-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality above traditional risk factors in unselected elderly primary care patients, supporting its utility for cardiovascular risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Beside their role in the diagnosis of heart failure in symptomatic patients with dyspnea, natriuretic peptides have been suggested to improve risk prediction of cardiac events and mortality in asymptomatic cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of NT-proBNP for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality above traditional risk factors in a prospective cohort study of unselected elderly patients in a representative primary care setting. METHODS: We followed 6382 patients of the getABI-study for 7 years. Associations of NT-proBNP levels (≤125; 125-300; >300pg/ml for all) with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were assessed using cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was higher in subjects with higher levels of NT-proBNP (all-cause mortality/cardiovascular mortality: 35.4%/6% for NT-proBNP > 300 pg/ml; 16.2%/40% for NT-proBNP 125-300 pg/ml vs. 11.4%/4% for NT-proBNP ≤ 125 pg/ml. Participants with a NT-proBNP levels > 300pg/ml had increased incidence of hard endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 3.62 (3.15-4.17) for all-cause mortality, and 6.38 (4.84-8.41) for cardiovascular mortality). These associations remained after adjustment for traditional risk factors and cardiac medications and diseases (HR = 2.64 (2.26-3.08) for all-cause mortality, and HR = 3.93 (2.90-5.32) for cardiovascular mortality). CONCLUSION: Our results show strong associations of higher NT-proBNP levels with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in an unselected, large population of elderly patients in the primary care setting independent of traditional risk factors indicating that NT-proBNP can help identifying subjects at high risk for cardiac events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rudolf et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Unselected elderly patients in primary care (n=6,382). Elevated baseline NT-proBNP (>300 pg/ml) vs. NT-proBNP <=125 pg/ml was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.99-2.74). Elevated baseline NT-proBNP (>300 vs <=125 pg/ml) independently predicted 7-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.99-2.74) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR 3.41) in elderly patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: