Why the study?
Do markers of thrombotic risk predict the development of thrombosis in patients with malignancy and indwelling central venous catheters?
Do markers of thrombotic risk predict the development of thrombosis in patients with malignancy and indwelling central venous catheters?
In patients with malignancy and indwelling venous catheters, prothrombotic markers are frequently elevated but do not predict the development of thrombosis.
Prothrombotic markers should not guide risk assessment or prophylaxis; leaves open need for validated predictors in prospective studies.
Markers of thrombotic risk--fibrinogen, factor VIII and immunoglobulin G (IgG) anticardiolipin titres--were measured, and the presence of lupus anticoagulant and factor V Leiden were assessed in 84 patients with a solid or haematological malignancy. These patients were monitored, following the insertion of an indwelling venous catheter, for thrombosis. Fifty-five were given prophylactic low-dose warfarin. Over a mean of 15 weeks there were 10 (12%) thrombotic events in 10 patients. Seven were on warfarin. Haemorrhagic problems occurred in three (5%), all on warfarin. Of the 84 patients, 86% had raised fibrinogen levels, 37% elevated factor VIII and 44% raised anticardiolipin levels. Lupus anticoagulant was present in five and three were heterozygous for factor V Leiden. A high prevalence of a range of prothrombotic changes was confirmed and the frequent presence of low-titre anticardiolipin antibody in subjects with malignancy demonstrated. However, none of these parameters predicted the development of thrombosis (P > 0.05).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ratcliffe et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: