Key result
LCA-defined major anxious depression strongly predicted incident cardiovascular events (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.11-3.25) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 4.32; 95% CI 1.35-13.86) in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Does comorbid anxious depression predict incident cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Observational (n=1,337)
Does comorbid anxious depression predict incident cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.9 (95% CI 1.11–3.25)
LCA-defined anxious depression is a common and strong predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes, highlighting the importance of identifying this phenotype for risk stratification.
May warrant closer CV monitoring in T2D; hypothesis-generating for intervention effects on events.
BACKGROUND: The aims were to determine whether anxious depression, defined by latent class analysis (LCA), predicts cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes and to compare the predictive power of anxious depression with Diagnostic & Statistical Manual Versions IV and 5 (DSM-IV/5) categories of depression and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). METHODS: Prospective observational study of 1,337 type 2 participants. Baseline assessment with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and the GAD Scale; LCA-defined groups with minor or major anxious depression based on anxiety and depression symptoms. Cox modeling used to compare the independent impact of: (1) LCA anxious depression, (2) DSM-IV/5 depression, (3) GAD on incident cardiovascular events and deaths after 4 years. RESULTS: LCA minor and major anxious depression was present in 21.9 and 7.8% of participants, respectively, DSM-IV/5 minor and major depression in 6.2 and 6.1%, respectively, and GAD in 4.8%. There were 110 deaths, 31 cardiovascular deaths, and 199 participants had incident cardiovascular events. In adjusted models, minor anxious depression (Hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals): 1.70 (1.15-2.50)) and major anxious depression (1.90 (1.11-3.25)) predicted incident cardiovascular events and major anxious depression also predicted cardiovascular mortality (4.32 (1.35-13.86)). By comparison, incident cardiovascular events were predicted by DSM-IV/5 major depression (2.10 (1.22-3.62)) only and cardiovascular mortality was predicted by both DSM-IV/5 major depression (3.56 (1.03-12.35)) and GAD (5.92 (1.84-19.08)). CONCLUSIONS: LCA-defined anxious depression is more common than DSM-IV/5 categories and is a strong predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. These data suggest that this diagnostic scheme has predictive validity and clinical relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruce et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes (n=1,337). LCA-defined anxious depression vs. No anxious depression was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular events (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.11-3.25). LCA-defined major anxious depression strongly predicted incident cardiovascular events (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.11-3.25) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 4.32; 95% CI 1.35-13.86) in type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: