Key result
Continued long-term anticoagulation is recommended post-atrial fibrillation ablation in patients satisfying CHADS criteria for elevated stroke risk.
Why the study?
Does continued long-term anticoagulation prevent stroke in patients with elevated CHADS scores following "successful" atrial fibrillation ablation?
Does continued long-term anticoagulation prevent stroke in patients with elevated CHADS scores following "successful" atrial fibrillation ablation?
The authors recommend continuing long-term anticoagulation post-AF ablation in patients with elevated stroke risk, as a true cure is difficult to define and stroke risk may not return to baseline.
Supports continued anticoagulation post-AF ablation in elevated-CHADS patients; leaves open randomized confirmation of stroke prevention.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant arrhythmia worldwide, and its incidence is increasing. There has been increasing interest in ablation therapy to treat atrial fibrillation. One reason some patients undergo AF ablation might be to obviate the need for warfarin therapy, although current guidelines do not support this rationale. The current review shows that it is difficult to define a true "cure" postablation, as many of these patients will go on to experience future paroxysms of AF (either symptomatic or silent). The mechanism underlying embolism in patients with AF is not completely understood, and no long-term evidence exists that "successfully ablated" patients return to a baseline risk of stroke comparable to an AF-naive population. The authors recommend continued long-term anticoagulation post-AF ablation in patients satisfying CHADS criteria for elevated stroke risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levitt et al. (2009) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Continued long-term anticoagulation was evaluated on Stroke or embolism. Continued long-term anticoagulation is recommended post-atrial fibrillation ablation in patients satisfying CHADS criteria for elevated stroke risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: