Key result
Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation or recovery had a 39% overall mortality rate, with 54.3% bridged to heart transplant (75% 1-year and 66% 5-year post-transplant survival).
Cohort (n=520)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To present the analyzed results on mechanical circulatory support (MCS) collected over a 7-year period, from 2000 to 2006, in France. METHODS: A cohort of 520 patients was analyzed. Mean age was 43.7 ± 13.6 years. The main causes of cardiac failure were ischemic cardiomyopathy (39%), idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (41.3%), or myocarditis (6.4%). Bridge to transplantation was indicated in 87.8% of patients, bridge to recovery in 9%, while destination therapy was proposed in 3.2% of patients. RESULTS: For patients in cardiogenic shock or advanced heart failure undergoing device implantation as bridge to transplantation or recovery (n=458), overall mortality was 39% (n=179). The main causes of mortality under MCS were multi-organ failure (MOF) (57.4%), neurological events (14.1%), or infections (11.9%). Heart transplantation was performed in 249 (54.3%) patients. The main causes of death following heart transplantation were primary graft failure (22.4%), MOF (14.3%), neurological event (14.3%), or infection (10.2%). Long-term survival in transplanted patients was 75 ± 2.8% at 1 year and 66 ± 3.4% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: MCS is an essential therapeutic tool to save the life of young patients with cardiogenic shock or advanced cardiac failure. Early MCS implantation and the availability of a device that is adapted to the patient's clinical status are prerequisites for reducing overall mortality rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazzucotelli et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock or advanced cardiac failure (n=520). Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was evaluated on Overall mortality in patients undergoing MCS as bridge to transplantation or recovery. Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation or recovery had a 39% overall mortality rate, with 54.3% bridged to heart transplant (75% 1-year and 66% 5-year post-transplant survival).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: