Key result
Peri-operative administration of levosimendan was not associated with an increased risk of reoperation for bleeding (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.57-1.79; p=0.97) in cardiac surgical patients.
Why the study?
Preliminary evidence suggested levosimendan increased postoperative bleeding in valve surgery patients, but no RCTs were designed specifically to address this issue.
Does peri-operative levosimendan increase the risk of post-operative bleeding and blood transfusion in cardiac surgical patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,528)
Does peri-operative levosimendan increase the risk of post-operative bleeding and blood transfusion in cardiac surgical patients?
Peri-operative administration of levosimendan does not increase the risk of post-operative bleeding or blood transfusion requirements in cardiac surgical patients.
Supports safe peri-operative levosimendan use in cardiac surgery; reinforces bleeding safety from Level 1 meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND: Levosimendan (LEVO), is an inotropic agent which has been shown to be associated with better myocardial performance, and higher survival rate in cardiac surgical patients. However, preliminary clinical evidence suggested that LEVO increased the risk of post-operative bleeding in patients undergoing valve surgery. Currently, there has been no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed specifically on this issue. Therefore, we performed present systemic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: ). Primary outcomes include post-operative blood loss and re-operation for bleeding. Secondary outcomes included post-operative transfusion of red blood cells (RBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet concentrates (PC). For continuous variables, treatment effects were calculated as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidential interval (CI). For dichotomous data, treatment effects were calculated as odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. RESULTS: Search yielded 15 studies including 1,528 patients. Meta-analysis suggested that, LEVO administration was not associated with increased risk of reoperation for bleeding post-operatively (OR = 1.01; 95%CI: 0.57 to 1.79; p = 0.97) and more blood loss volume (WMD = 28.25; 95%CI: -19.21 to 75.72; p = 0.24). Meta-analysis also demonstrated that, LEVO administration did not increase post-operative transfusion requirement for RBC (rate: OR = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.72 to 1.30; p = 0.83 and volume: WMD = 0.34; 95%CI: -0.55 to 1.22; p = 0.46), FFP (volume: WMD = 0.00; 95%CI: -0.10 to 0.10; p = 1.00) and PC (rate: OR = 1.01; 95%CI: 0.41 to 2.50; p = 0.98 and volume: WMD = 0.00; 95%CI: -0.05 to 0.04; p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggested that, peri-operative administration of LEVO was not associated with increased risks of post-operative bleeding and blood transfusion requirement in cardiac surgical patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in cardiac surgical patients (n=1,528). Levosimendan was evaluated on reoperation for bleeding post-operatively (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.79, p=0.97). Peri-operative administration of levosimendan was not associated with an increased risk of reoperation for bleeding (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.57-1.79; p=0.97) in cardiac surgical patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: