Key result
A three-month cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improved left ventricular myocardial perfusion during stress (total summed stress score decreased from 6.95 to 4.51) in women with microvascular angina.
Why the study?
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve left ventricular perfusion and exercise capacity in women with microvascular angina?
Cohort (n=55)
No
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve left ventricular perfusion and exercise capacity in women with microvascular angina?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.51% vs 6.95%
p-value: p=<0.01
A three-month cardiac rehabilitation program improves both physical capacity and myocardial perfusion in women with microvascular angina.
Supports cardiac rehabilitation in women with microvascular angina; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac syndrome X (CSX) is linked with changes in microcirculation, without significant changes in main coronary vessels. According to European Society of Cardiology 2013 stable coronary artery disease (CAD) criteria, CSX was replaced by microvascular angina (MA). The main feature of MA should be regional myocardial ischaemia; however, there are several works on this subject which failed to demonstrate the presence of perfusion defects. AIM: To determine the effect of non-pharmacological procedures (cardiac rehabilitation) in patients diagnosed with MA on changes in left ventricular perfusion as assessed by myocardial single photon emission computed tomography, along with potential related improvements in exercise capacity. METHODS: Toward this goal we screened for the presence of CAD in a group of 528 women, of whom 55 were not only diagnosed with MA but also agreed to participate in our study, which involved myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) studies, during which exercise tests and cardiac rehabilitation were performed. RESULTS: Comparison of results obtained at the beginning of the study with data obtained after completion of a three month period of cardiac rehabilitation showed improvements in both exercise test parameters (length of test, metabolic equivalents, blood pressure control during extortion) and MPI parameters for the left ventricle (both at rest and stress, global and regional). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation is a very useful tool of choice in the treatment of patients with MA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szot et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Microvascular angina (n=55). Cardiac rehabilitation vs. Baseline was evaluated on Total summed stress score for left ventricle perfusion (p=<0.01). A three-month cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improved left ventricular myocardial perfusion during stress (total summed stress score decreased from 6.95 to 4.51) in women with microvascular angina.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: