Key result
A commentary on a model-based meta-analysis evaluating optimal doses of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban to achieve minimal simulated mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
What is the optimal dose of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) to achieve minimal simulated mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation?
What is the optimal dose of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) to achieve minimal simulated mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation?
This comment discusses a model-based meta-analysis evaluating the optimal dosing of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors in patients with atrial fibrillation.
In a recent issue of Blood Advances, Yoshioka et al 1 performed a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) to evaluate the optimal dose of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). To develop the model, they used reported population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic models to estimate time profiles of changes in the prothrombin time (PT) in 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors in AF patients. After assay normalization, the authors calculated the model-based relationships between the simulated PT ratio profiles and the rates of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding, and used this information to determine the dose of each oral FXa inhibitor that would achieve minimal simulated mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willmann et al. (2018) conducted a letter in Atrial fibrillation. Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) was evaluated on Ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and minimal simulated mortality. A commentary on a model-based meta-analysis evaluating optimal doses of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban to achieve minimal simulated mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: