Key result
Different waist circumference measurement sites show similar accuracy for predicting clustered metabolic risk factors.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,140)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The location of waist circumference (WC) measurement differs among diagnostic guidelines for the metabolic syndrome. The present study examined which of four WC measurements was associated most strongly with the clustering of metabolic risk factors in cross-sectional study. The subjects comprised 1,140 Japanese employees, aged 20-70 years, who underwent health examinations in 2007 and 2008. WC was measured at (i) the narrowest part of the waist, (ii) midway between the lowest rib and the iliac crest, (iii) the umbilical level, and (iv) immediately above the iliac crest. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the ability of each WC measurement to predict the presence of two or more other components of the metabolic syndrome, as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) in 2005. Multiple risk factors were seen in 43.0% of the men and 12.9% of the women. The minimum and maximum WC measurements differed by 3.9 cm among the men and 12.6 cm among the women. The areas under the curve examining the ability of the four WC measurements to predict the clustering of multiple risk factors were similar. If the same WC cutoff value was applied, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome changed considerably according to the site of WC measurement. The four WC measurements had similar screening abilities. Given the differences in the WC values according to the site of measurement, WC must be measured at the site specified by each diagnostic guideline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsushita et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome risk factors (n=1,140). Waist circumference measured at four different anatomical sites (narrowest part, midway between lowest rib and iliac crest, umbilical level, immediately above iliac crest) vs. Comparison across the four waist circumference measurement sites was evaluated on Presence of two or more other components of the metabolic syndrome (NCEP-ATP III 2005 definition). Waist circumference at four anatomical sites differed by up to 3.9 cm in men and 12.6 cm in women, but showed similar ROC areas under the curve for predicting clustered metabolic risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: