This article proposes using variance-ratio tests based on the ranks and signs of a time series to test the null that the series is a martingale difference sequence. Unlike conventional variance-ratio tests, these tests can be exact. In Monte Carlo simulations, I find that they can also be more powerful than conventional variance-ratio tests. I apply the proposed tests to five exchange-rate series and find that they are capable of detecting violations of the martingale hypothesis for all five series, whereas conventional variance-ratio tests yield ambiguous results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan H. Wright (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: