CONTEXT: One or both commercial tuberculin skin test reagents (Aplisol and Tubersol) may have a high rate of false-positive reactions. OBJECTIVE: To compare the reaction size and specificity of skin testing with Aplisol, Tubersol, and the standard purified protein derivative (PPD-S1). DESIGN: Double-blind trial, conducted between May 14, 1997, and October28, 1997, in which each individual received 4 tuberculin skin reagents at sites assigned at random. SETTING: Health departments and universities in 6 US cities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1555 persons at low risk of latent tuberculosis infection. INTERVENTION: Simultaneous skin tests with Aplisol, Tubersol, PPD-S1, and either a second PPD-S1 or PPD-S2 (a proposed new standard). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reaction size at each injection site measured by 2 investigators blinded to type of reagent. RESULTS: Aplisol produced slightly larger reactions than Tubersol, but this difference did not significantly change skin test interpretation. The mean +/- SD reaction sizes were 3.4+/-4.2 mm with Aplisol, 2.1+/-3.2 mm with Tubersol, and 2.5+/-3.6 mm with PPD-S1. Assuming that all participants were uninfected and using a 10-mm cutoff, the specificities of the tests were high: Aplisol, 98.2%; Tubersol, 99.2%; and PPD-S1, 98.9%. Significant variability was not detected in interobserver, host, and lot-to-lot reagent comparisons. CONCLUSION: Using a cutoff of at least 10 mm, testing with 3 different PPD reagents resulted in similar numbers of uninfected persons being correctly classified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Margarita E. Villarino (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: