Key result
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravenous vernakalant for the rapid conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation, though no quantitative results are reported in the abstract.
Why the study?
Does intravenous vernakalant improve conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation?
Systematic Review
Does intravenous vernakalant improve conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation?
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of intravenous vernakalant for the rapid conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation.
Reinforces vernakalant for rapid recent-onset AF conversion; extends prior RCTs with pooled safety and efficacy synthesis.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Conversion to sinus rhythm is usually appropriate in patients with acute, symptomatic atrial fibrillation in order to reduce symptoms and prevent complications. Electrical cardioversion is the most used and widespread technique, but requires deep sedation and a fasting state. Pharmacological alternatives are burdened by a delayed onset of action and potential proarrhythmic effects. Therefore, new therapeutic options are being sought. Among those, vernakalant, showed a good efficacy profile and a short onset of action, but with conflicting evidence regarding potential serious adverse events. This drug profile will summarize the pharmacology behind this new drug and review recent evidence in terms of safety and efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerra et al. (2014) conducted a systematic review in Recent onset atrial fibrillation. Intravenous vernakalant was evaluated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravenous vernakalant for the rapid conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation, though no quantitative results are reported in the abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: