Key result
The Atherogenic Index of Plasma was an independent predictor of acute myocardial infarction (OR 31.846), and its combination with LDL-C yielded an AUC of 0.819 for predicting the condition.
Why the study?
Does the Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP), alone or combined with LDL-C, predict the risk of acute myocardial infarction in hospitalized patients?
Case-Control (n=340)
No
Does the Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP), alone or combined with LDL-C, predict the risk of acute myocardial infarction in hospitalized patients?
The Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP), particularly when combined with LDL-C, is an independent predictor of acute myocardial infarction and may serve as a practical diagnostic tool.
Background and aims Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a prevalent medical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The principal underlying factor leading to myocardial infarction is atherosclerosis, with dyslipidemia being a key risk factor. Nonetheless, relying solely on a single lipid level is insufficient for accurately predicting the onset and progression of AMI. The present investigation aims to assess established clinical indicators in China, to identify practical, precise, and effective tools for predicting AMI. Methods The study enrolled 267 patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction as the experimental group, while the control group consisted of 73 hospitalized patients with normal coronary angiography. The investigators collected general clinical data and relevant laboratory test results and computed the Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) for each participant. Using acute myocardial infarction status as the dependent variable and controlling for confounding factors such as smoking history, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), blood pressure at admission, and diabetes history, the researchers conducted multivariate logistic regression analysis with AIP as an independent variable. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to determine the predictive value of AIP and AIP combined with LDL-C for acute myocardial infarction. Result The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the AIP was an independent predictor of acute myocardial infarction. The optimal cut-off value for AIP to predict AMI was −0.06142, with a sensitivity of 81.3%, a specificity of 65.8%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.801 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.743–0.859, P < 0.001). When AIP was combined with LDL-C, the best cut-off value for predicting acute myocardial infarction was 0.756107, with a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 74%, and an AUC of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.759–0.879, P < 0.001). Conclusions The AIP is considered an autonomous determinant of risk for AMI. Utilizing the AIP index alone, as well as in conjunction with LDL-C, can serve as effective predictors of AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) conducted a case-control in Acute myocardial infarction (n=340). Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) vs. Normal coronary angiography was evaluated on Acute myocardial infarction (OR 31.846, 95% CI 6.098-166.314, p=<0.001). The Atherogenic Index of Plasma was an independent predictor of acute myocardial infarction (OR 31.846), and its combination with LDL-C yielded an AUC of 0.819 for predicting the condition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: