Using the duality between seemingly different (2+1)-dimensional $[(2+1)d]$ conformal field theories (CFT) proposed recently [D. T. Son, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031027 (2015); M. A. Metlitski and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. B 93, 245151 (2016); C. Wang and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. X 6, 011034 (2015); C. Wang and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041031 (2015); C. Wang and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. B 93, 085110 (2016); C. Xu and Y.-Z. You, Phys. Rev. B 92, 220416 (2015); D. F. Mross et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 016802 (2016); A. Karch and D. Tong, arXiv:1606.01893; N. Seiberg et al., arXiv:1606.01989; P.-S. Hsin and N. Seiberg, arXiv:1607.07457], we study a series of $(2+1)d$ stable self-dual interacting CFTs. These CFTs can be realized (for instance) on the boundary of the $3d$ bosonic topological insulator protected by U(1) and time-reversal symmetry (T), and they remain stable as long as these symmetries are preserved. When realized as a boundary system, these CFTs can be driven into anomalous fractional quantum Hall states once T is broken. We demonstrate that the newly proposed dualities allow us to study these CFTs quantitatively through a controlled calculation, without relying on a large flavor number of matter fields. We also propose a numerical test for our results, which would provide strong evidence for the originally proposed duality between Dirac fermion and QED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: