This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate endolymphatic hydrops (EH) in patients with Meniere disease (MD) using high-resolution 7-tesla (7T) MRI volumetry with the goal of identifying anatomic differences that might clarify MD's etiology and inform therapeutic strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twelve adults with MD and 5 healthy controls met the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Participants underwent 7T MRI, including axial T2-weighted and 3D-FLAIR sequences, before and 4 hours after intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agent administration. Images were coregistered and subtracted to identify endolymph as a negative signal, followed by blinded manual segmentation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Volumetric measurements of the membranous labyrinth [utricle+semicircular canals duct (SCC), saccule, cochlear duct, and total endolymph]. RESULTS: Fifteen MD-affected ears were compared with 10 healthy control ears. Median endolymph volumes were significantly larger in MD-affected ears in the utricle and SCC (99.53 vs. 55.29 mm 3 , P =0.033) but not in the saccule ( P =0.56) or cochlear duct ( P =0.21). The ratio of endolymph to total fluid inner ear fluid was also greater in MD-affected ears compared with controls (62.3% vs. 44.0%). Unaffected MD ears did not differ from their affected counterparts across compartments. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo 7T MRI volumetry revealed significantly greater EH in the utricle and SCC of MD-affected ears versus controls, demonstrating its utility for characterizing EH and guiding more precise diagnostics and therapies. Future work must refine methods to reliably distinguish the utricle-saccule boundary-through improved imaging protocols or automated segmentation-to assess saccular hydrops in living patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: