The leading Lamb-shift terms are evaluated for the valence electrons of neutral alkali-metal and coinage metal atoms (groups 1 and 11, respectively). The vacuum polarization (VP) contribution is treated using the Uehling potential and the self-energy (SE) contribution using either a density-based α³ expression or the ESE/EVP ratios by Johnson and Soff [At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 33, 405 (1985)]. Both Dirac-Fock and model-potential wave functions are tested. The result for the valence ns electron is a destabilization, rising at moderate Z values (30--80) as Z² and more steeply at high $Z.$ The (n-1)d electrons suffer an indirect stabilization. The effects are opposite those of kinetic Dirac relativity and about 1--2% of them. They are roughly half of the valence Breit interaction and rise to about 0.5% of the ionization potential for $Z=111--119.$
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyykkö et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: