A forward looking model of the demand for M 1 based on minimising multi-period quadratic costs is derived. The dynamic response of the demand for money differs depending on whether shocks are anticipated or unanticipated. The restrictions implicit in the forward model are tested and the model is compared with a conventional ADL backward looking model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keith Cuthbertson (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: