Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study describes a simple and sensitive method for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water samples by temperature-controlled ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction prior to high performance liquid chromatography with an ultraviolet detector. Three ionic liquids including 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [C6MIM][PF6], 1-benzyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [C7MIM][PF6] and 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [C8MIM][PF6] were investigated for enrichment, and the experimental results indicated that the best extraction efficiencies were achieved when [C8MIM][PF6] was used as the extraction solvent. Other factors affecting the extraction efficiency such as the volume of ionic liquid, heating temperature, extraction time, addition of 2-propanol, centrifugation time and ionic strength were also optimized. Under the optimal conditions, the detection limits of PAHs were in the range of 0.0005–0.88 μg L−1. The intra-day and inter-day precisions of the proposed method (RSDs, n = 6) were in the range of 2.7–7.4% and 5.5–11.4%, respectively. The proposed method was applied to the analysis of real environmental water samples and good spiked recoveries in the range of 83.5–118% were achieved. All these results indicate that the proposed method is a viable alternative to existing methods and would be very useful in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: