Computational and experimental studies show that Fe(BPMEN)-catalyzed olefin oxidation has two (FeIII-OOH and FeV=O) oxidant species, which act with comparable activation barriers. The presence of water favors formation of an HO-FeV=O oxidant via water-assisted O-OH bond cleavage and leads to both epoxide and cis-diol products. In the absence of water, the oxidant is the FeIII-OOH [or (MeCN)FeIII-OOH], and oxidation mainly leads to epoxide. This conclusion differs from that derived from DFT investigations of iron-porphyrin-catalyzed olefin epoxidation, where the FeIII-OOH pathway is deemed too high in energy to be plausible. The difference between these two systems may lie in the more flexible coordination environment of the non-heme iron complex, which has an available adjacent coordination site that contributes to the activation of the peroxide in both wa and nwa pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quiñonero et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: