Key result
High-volume hospital status was associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality in the early era of 2016-2021 (OR 0.48), but this volume-outcome relationship was not present in the recent era (OR 1.30) or the overall cohort (OR 0.80).
Why the study?
The relationship between hospital volume of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) explants and postoperative mortality needed to be evaluated.
Does higher hospital TAVR explant volume reduce 30-day and 1-year mortality following TAVR explantation compared to low-volume hospitals?
Observational (n=1,238)
Yes
Does higher hospital TAVR explant volume reduce 30-day and 1-year mortality following TAVR explantation compared to low-volume hospitals?
An early volume-outcome relationship demonstrating improved 30-day mortality at high-volume TAVR explant centers has attenuated in recent years, though concomitant complex surgeries may still benefit from high-volume hospital management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Era-specific volume benefit for TAVR explant mortality no longer evident; leaves open optimal center selection in contemporary practice.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between hospital volume of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) explants and postoperative mortality. METHODS: The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services was queried from 2016 to 2024 for patients who underwent TAVR explant. The study period was divided into 2 eras: early (2016-2021) and recent (2022-2024). Hospitals were classified grouped as low volume or high volume. Both 30-day and 1-year mortality were compared, and multivariable analysis was performed. RESULTS: We identified a total of 123 TAVR explants during the study period. Of the 375 hospitals that performed at least 1 TAVR explant, 235 (63%) performed fewer than 3 explants. Postoperative mortality was 13.3% at 30 days and 18.3% at 1 year. Thirty-day mortality was higher in low-volume hospitals compared to high-volume hospitals in the early era (17% vs 9.68%; P = .029), but not in the recent era (11.0% vs 13.4%; P = .409). At low-volume hospitals, both 30-day and 1-year mortality were higher following concomitant TAVR explant compared to isolated TAVR explant (19.9% vs 9.3% [P < .001] and 25.4% vs 13.6% [P < .001], respectively), but not in high-volume hospitals (14% vs 8.78% [P = .148] and 18.3% vs 15.5% [P = .518], respectively). On multivariable analysis, high-volume hospital status was associated with lower mortality for the early era (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.95), but not for the recent era (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.71-2.38) or the total cohort (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.51-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: While a hospital volume-outcome relationship to TAVR explant mortality existed in the early era, recent data suggest no volume-outcome relationship. With the lack of a volume-outcome relationship, TAVR explant will become a fundamental cardiac surgical procedure. High-risk concomitant surgery may benefit from high-volume hospital management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braasch et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) explantation (n=1,238). High-volume hospital status vs. Low-volume hospital status was evaluated on 30-day postoperative mortality (overall cohort) (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51-1.24, p=0.303). High-volume hospital status was associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality in the early era of 2016-2021 (OR 0.48), but this volume-outcome relationship was not present in the recent era (OR 1.30) or the overall cohort (OR 0.80).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: