Key result
New anticoagulants like dabigatran (1.1%/year vs warfarin 1.7%/year; P<0.001) and rivaroxaban (1.7%/year vs 2.15%/year; P=0.015) effectively reduce stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Do direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) reduce stroke and systemic embolism compared to warfarin or aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Do direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) reduce stroke and systemic embolism compared to warfarin or aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Direct oral anticoagulants offer an effective and more convenient alternative to vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Supports DOAC use over warfarin for AF stroke prevention; leaves open comparative effectiveness and long-term safety in diverse populations.
Oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation is obligatory to lower the risk of spontaneous cerebrovascular and systemic thromboembolism. For this purpose, vitamin K antagonists (coumarins) have been recommended as the most effective drugs for a long time. However, problems with the practical use of these agents, e.g. the need for frequent and regular coagulation controls, the inter-individual differences in maintaining a stable therapeutic range, as well as drug or food interactions, have led to the search and investigation of alternative compounds characterized by a more simple use (e.g. without regular controls of therapeutic levels), high efficacy, as well as low risk of bleeding. The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban have recently been investigated to prove whether they fulfill the high expectancy of an ideal anticoagulant with respect to a more favorable efficacy/safety profile and without the need for coagulation controls, thereby improving quality of life. Dabigatran (RE-LY) achieved an impressive reduction in stroke and non-central nervous system (non-CNS) embolism (110 mg: 1.5%/year; 150 mg: 1.1%/year) in contrast to warfarin (1.7%/year; P = 0.34 and P < 0.001) with a favorable action on bleeding hazards. The results of rivaroxaban which were obtained in the ROCKET AF study (on treatment analysis: stroke and non-CNS embolism: 1.7%/year vs. 2.15%/year with warfarin; P = 0.015; primary safety endpoint major and minor bleeding: 14.91 vs. 14.52%; P = 0.442) point in the same direction. And finally, compared to aspirin, apixaban reduced the combined primary efficacy endpoint by 52% with comparable rates of bleeding (AVERROES). This review gives a summary of the current knowledge about these agents and their potential future importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Höchtl et al. (2011) conducted a review in atrial fibrillation. New anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) vs. vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) or aspirin was evaluated. New anticoagulants like dabigatran (1.1%/year vs warfarin 1.7%/year; P<0.001) and rivaroxaban (1.7%/year vs 2.15%/year; P=0.015) effectively reduce stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: