This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In this paper, we give an account of some of the necessary conditions for an effectively functioning public sphere, and then explore the question of whether these conditions allow for the expression of ideas and values that are fundamentally incompatible with those of liberalism. We argue that speakers who advocate or glorify violence against democratic institutions fall outside the parameters of what constitutes legitimate public debate and may in fact undermine the conditions necessary for the flourishing of free speech and public dialogue more generally.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sorial et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: