Key result
Repaglinide eliminated myocardial ischemic preconditioning in 83.3% of patients with type 2 diabetes and CAD, whereas vildagliptin caused cessation in only 28%.
Why the study?
Does repaglinide or vildagliptin affect ischemic preconditioning in patients with type 2 diabetes and symptomatic coronary artery disease?
Does repaglinide or vildagliptin affect ischemic preconditioning in patients with type 2 diabetes and symptomatic coronary artery disease?
Repaglinide, but not vildagliptin, eliminates the protective mechanism of ischemic preconditioning in patients with type 2 diabetes and CAD, suggesting vildagliptin may be a safer alternative in this population.
Repaglinide was associated with greater loss of ischemic preconditioning than vildagliptin; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of two hypoglycemic drugs on ischemic preconditioning (IPC) patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 96 consecutive patients allocated into two groups: 42 to group repaglinide (R) and 54 to group vildagliptin (V). All patients underwent two consecutive exercise tests (ET1 and ET2) in phase 1 without drugs. In phase 2, 1 day after ET1 and -2, 2 mg repaglinide three times daily or 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily was given orally to patients in the respective group for 6 days. On the seventh day, 60 min after 6 mg repaglinide or 100 mg vildagliptin, all patients underwent two consecutive exercise tests (ET3 and ET4). RESULTS: In phase 1, IPC was demonstrated by improvement in the time to 1.0 mm ST-segment depression and rate pressure product (RPP). All patients developed ischemia in ET3; however, 83.3% of patients in group R experienced ischemia earlier in ET4, without significant improvement in RPP, indicating the cessation of IPC (P < 0.0001). In group V, only 28% of patients demonstrated IPC cessation, with 72% still having the protective effect (P < 0.0069). CONCLUSIONS: Repaglinide eliminated myocardial IPC, probably by its effect on the KATP channel. Vildagliptin did not damage this protective mechanism in a relevant way in patients with type 2 diabetes and CAD, suggesting a good alternative treatment in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garcia et al. (2012) studied Type 2 diabetes and symptomatic coronary artery disease (n=96). Repaglinide vs. Vildagliptin was evaluated on Cessation of ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Repaglinide eliminated myocardial ischemic preconditioning in 83.3% of patients with type 2 diabetes and CAD, whereas vildagliptin caused cessation in only 28%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: