Key result
High-intensity interval exercise resulted in lower mean ventilation (P<0.001) and lower perceived exertion (P<0.05) compared to moderate-intensity continuous exercise in patients with stable CHD.
Why the study?
Does high-intensity interval exercise improve physiological responses and perceived exertion compared to moderate-intensity continuous exercise in patients with stable CHD?
RCT (n=20)
random order
Does high-intensity interval exercise improve physiological responses and perceived exertion compared to moderate-intensity continuous exercise in patients with stable CHD?
High-intensity interval exercise is safe, well-tolerated, and associated with lower perceived exertion compared to isocaloric moderate-intensity continuous exercise in patients with stable CHD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports HIIT preference in stable CHD rehab; extends RCT evidence on superior ventilatory and exertional responses versus moderate continuous exercise.
PURPOSE: although the acute physiological responses to continuous exercise have been well documented in CHD patients, no previous study has examined the responses to high-intensity intermittent exercise in these patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the physiological responses to a high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) protocol versus a moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) protocol of similar energy expenditure in CHD patients. METHODS: twenty patients with stable CHD (19 males and 1 female, 62 ± 11 yr) were assigned in random order to a single session of HIIE corresponding to 15-s intervals at 100% of peak power output (PPO) and 15-s passive recovery intervals and, 2 wk later, to an isocaloric MICE corresponding to 70% of PPO. RESULTS: both protocols were equivalent in terms of energy expenditure. The HIIE protocol resulted in lower mean ventilation (P < 0.001) for a small difference in metabolic demand. All participants preferred the HIIE mainly because the perceived exertion measured by the Borg scale was lower (P < 0.05). No elevation of serum concentration of troponin T was found in all participants at baseline and at 20 min and 24 h after the exercise sessions, thus excluding the presence of any exercise-induced myocardial injury in our patients. CONCLUSIONS: when considering physiological responses, safety, and perceived exertion, the HIIE protocol seemed to be well tolerated and more efficient in this group of stable CHD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guiraud et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in stable CHD (n=20). High-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) vs. Moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) at 70% of peak power output was evaluated on Mean ventilation and perceived exertion (p=<0.001). High-intensity interval exercise resulted in lower mean ventilation (P<0.001) and lower perceived exertion (P<0.05) compared to moderate-intensity continuous exercise in patients with stable CHD.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: