Residual chloride in coastal freshwater resources is particularly concerning the Netherlands, where stringent chloride limits (150 mg/L) exist for drinking water. FeCl 3 coagulant addition during treatment exacerbates the chloride concentration in the finished drinking water. This study presents the first systematic comparison of liquid FeCl 3 and chloride-free, liquid form ferrate (FerSol®, The Netherlands) and examines their treatment performance and potential impact on post-coagulation stages. Results confirmed no additional chloride in the water treated with FerSol. Under low G (454 s −1 ) and 20 mg Fe/L at pH 8, FerSol matched FeCl 3 coagulation performance in turbidity (96%), UVT (>93%), and residual iron (<0.1 mg/L), though showing 10% lower DOC removal. High G (761 s −1 ) compromised UVT and DOC reduction when elevating residual iron to ~0.3 mg/L. FerSol coagulation produced smaller, less settleable flocs with settling velocities 62% slower than FeCl 3 . Unlike FeCl 3 , FerSol reduced >7 log E. coli and 1 log B. subtilis at 30 μM after 60 min at pH 7.4. Furthermore, FerSol also decomposed high-MW biopolymer and humics fractions, resulting in the increases in low-MW fractions by 10% and NOX-AOC by 10× (~15 μg C/L). These resulted from the generation of • OH and 1 O 2 during FerSol decomposition. Additionally, in-situ formed Fe(III) by FerSol was characterized by colloidal Fe c ~72%, which was less effective in UVT and DOC removals. This study provides a benchmark for the treatment efficacy of FerSol compared to FeCl 3 . Tailored operational conditions are required to maximize its complementary oxidation and coagulation effects on water quality and biostability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hua et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: