Key result
Higher RPR linked to ~8% higher odds of 28-day heart failure readmission per 0.1 increase.
Why the study?
No studies had investigated the association between red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio and readmission rates among patients with heart failure.
Is admission red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR) associated with 28-day post-discharge readmission rate in patients hospitalized with heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,978)
No
Is admission red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR) associated with 28-day post-discharge readmission rate in patients hospitalized with heart failure?
Elevated admission RDW-to-platelet ratio (RPR) is an easily obtainable, independent predictor of 28-day and 3-month hospital readmission in patients with heart failure.
RPR may identify heart failure patients at higher 28-day readmission risk; extends biomarker observations but leaves open its utility for guiding interventions.
Background To date, no studies have investigated the association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW)-to-platelet ratio (RPR) and readmission rates among patients with heart failure (HF). As such, the present study aimed to examine the relationship between RPR and readmission rates in patients with HF. Methods Data for this study were obtained from the Fourth People's Hospital (Zigong, Sichuan Province, China). Patients were diagnosed with HF in accordance with European Society of Cardiology criteria. The primary outcome was the 28-day readmission rate. Various logistic regression models were constructed to explore the association between RPR and the 28-day readmission rate. Results The study comprised 1978 patients with HF, with a 28-day readmission rate of 6.98%. RPR emerged as an independent risk factor for 28-day readmission, evidenced by consistent results across the various regression-adjusted models. The covariate-adjusted propensity score model demonstrated that every 0.1 increase in RPR was associated with an 8.2% increase in 28-day readmission rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.082 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.012–1.158]; P = 0.0212). Similarly, each 0.1 change in RPR was associated with a 9.8% (OR 1.098 [95% CI 1.014–1.188]) and 7.3% (OR 1.073 [95% CI 0.991–1.161]) increase in 3- and 6-month readmission rates, respectively. However, RPR was not statistically associated with the 6-month readmission rate. Curve fit plots illustrated a nonlinear positive correlation between RPR and 28-day, and 3- and 6-month readmissions. Moreover, the effects of RPR on 28-day, and 3- and 6-month readmission rates remained robust across subgroup variables in stratified analysis. Finally, the effect sizes of pooled multiply imputed data were consistent with the original data, suggesting robust results. Conclusion RPR was an independent risk factor for 28-day readmission among patients with HF and also demonstrated modest predictive value for readmissions at 3 and 6 months, despite being non-significant for the 6-month readmission rate. Early identification of patients with HF with elevated RPR would facilitate management and may confer favorable effects on prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=1,978). Red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR) (per 0.1 unit increase) vs. Lower baseline RPR (continuous exposure) was evaluated on 28-day post-discharge readmission rate (OR 1.082, 95% CI 1.012-1.158, p=0.0212). Each 0.1 increase in red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR) was associated with an 8.2% higher odds of 28-day readmission in patients with heart failure (OR 1.082; P=0.0212).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: