Key result
PD-1 blockade plus DEB-BACE/BAI improved prognosis for advanced NSCLC compared to DEB-BACE/BAI alone (P<0.001), with similar overall adverse event rates (40.7% vs 36.8%, P=0.731).
Why the study?
DEB-BACE/BAI are treatment options for advanced NSCLC refractory or intolerant to systemic therapy, but the comparative effectiveness and safety of adding PD-1 blockade were unverified.
Does the addition of PD-1 blockade to DEB-BACE/BAI improve survival in patients with advanced NSCLC resistant to standard therapies?
Cohort (n=84)
No
Does the addition of PD-1 blockade to DEB-BACE/BAI improve survival in patients with advanced NSCLC resistant to standard therapies?
p-value: p=<0.001
The addition of PD-1 blockade to DEB-BACE/BAI improves survival outcomes in patients with advanced, refractory NSCLC while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.
May improve prognosis when added to DEB-BACE/BAI in advanced NSCLC but raises grade 3 irAEs; hypothesis-generating pending randomized trials.
Background: Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE)/bronchial artery infusion chemotherapy (BAI) have been investigated as treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially for those patients who develop refractoriness to or are intolerant to systemic chemotherapy. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of DEB-BACE/BAI with and without programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade for advanced NSCLC, and to investigate the effectiveness and safety of combination regimens. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included advanced NSCLC patients who were intolerant to or were resistant to systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or molecular targeted therapy and underwent DEB-BACE/BAI between October 2016 and October 2021 in Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology. A total of 84 advanced NSCLC patients (DEB-BACE/BAI + PD-1 blockade group: group A, n=27; DEB-BACE/BAI: group B, n=57) were enrolled finally. The embolic agent CalliSpheres (100-300, 300-500, or 500-700 µm) loaded with gemcitabine (800 mg) was administered during the DEB-BACE procedure. The adverse events (AEs) and outcomes were compared. Of these, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared via Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the predictors of PFS and OS. Results: 8.0 months, P<0.001) than group B. The predictors of PFS for DEB-BACE/BAI included tumor diameter (P=0.013), immunotherapy (P<0.001), and DEB-BACE/BAI cycles (P=0.012), whereas the predictors of OS included tumor diameter (P=0.021), extrapulmonary metastases (P=0.041), immunotherapy (P<0.001), and DEB-BACE/BAI cycles (P=0.020). The incidence rates of overall AEs in groups A and B were 40.7% (11/27) and 36.8% (21/57), respectively, and no significant difference was found (P=0.731). Group A had an incidence rate of 11.1% for grade 3 immunotherapy-related AEs (irAEs). There were no incidences of ectopic embolization or spinal artery injury. Conclusions: Compared with DEB-BACE/BAI, PD-1 blockade plus DEB-BACE/BAI could improve the prognosis for advanced NSCLC despite the associated risk of grade 3 irAEs. The combination regimens are promising and safe approaches for advanced NSCLC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n=84). PD-1 blockade plus DEB-BACE/BAI vs. DEB-BACE/BAI alone was evaluated on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p=<0.001). PD-1 blockade plus DEB-BACE/BAI improved prognosis for advanced NSCLC compared to DEB-BACE/BAI alone (P<0.001), with similar overall adverse event rates (40.7% vs 36.8%, P=0.731).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: