Key result
Tonic aortic depressor nerve stimulation did not significantly affect the slope of dynamic gain in the neural arc transfer function (14.7 vs 16.9 dB/decade) in anesthetized rats.
Why the study?
Does electrical stimulation of the baroreceptor afferent nerve impede normal short-term arterial pressure regulation mediated by the stimulated nerve in anesthetized rats?
Does electrical stimulation of the baroreceptor afferent nerve impede normal short-term arterial pressure regulation mediated by the stimulated nerve in anesthetized rats?
Absolute Event Rate: 14.7% vs 16.9%
p-value: p=not significant
Electrical stimulation of the baroreceptor afferent nerve lowers blood pressure and sympathetic nerve activity without impeding the dynamic characteristics of the arterial baroreflex, suggesting short-term blood pressure regulation is preserved during baroreflex activation therapy.
Electrical stimulation preserves baroreflex dynamics in this model; leaves open translation to clinical baroreflex activation therapy.
Although electrical activation of the carotid sinus baroreflex (baroreflex activation therapy) is being explored as a device therapy for resistant hypertension, possible effects on baroreflex dynamic characteristics of interaction between electrical stimulation and pressure inputs are not fully elucidated. To examine whether the electrical stimulation of the baroreceptor afferent nerve impedes normal short-term arterial pressure (AP) regulation mediated by the stimulated nerve, we electrically stimulated the right aortic depressor nerve (ADN) while estimating the baroreflex dynamic characteristics by imposing pressure inputs to the isolated baroreceptor region of the right ADN in nine anesthetized rats. A Gaussian white noise signal with a mean of 120 mmHg and standard deviation of 20 mmHg was used for the pressure perturbation. A tonic ADN stimulation (2 or 5 Hz, 10 V, 0.1-ms pulse width) decreased mean sympathetic nerve activity (367.0 ± 70.9 vs. 247.3 ± 47.2 arbitrary units, P < 0.01) and mean AP (98.4 ± 7.8 vs. 89.2 ± 4.5 mmHg, P < 0.01) during dynamic pressure perturbation. The ADN stimulation did not affect the slope of dynamic gain in the neural arc transfer function from pressure perturbation to sympathetic nerve activity (16.9 ± 1.0 vs. 14.7 ± 1.6 dB/decade, not significant). These results indicate that electrical stimulation of the baroreceptor afferent nerve does not significantly impede the dynamic characteristics of the arterial baroreflex concomitantly mediated by the stimulated nerve. Short-term AP regulation by the arterial baroreflex may be preserved during the baroreflex activation therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawada et al. (2017) studied this question. Tonic aortic depressor nerve (ADN) stimulation vs. No stimulation (baseline) was evaluated on Slope of dynamic gain in the neural arc transfer function from pressure perturbation to sympathetic nerve activity (p=not significant). Tonic aortic depressor nerve stimulation did not significantly affect the slope of dynamic gain in the neural arc transfer function (14.7 vs 16.9 dB/decade) in anesthetized rats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: