Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess cases of pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Does early repair improve outcomes compared to delayed repair in patients with bile duct injuries?
Cohort (n=64)
No
Does early repair improve outcomes compared to delayed repair in patients with bile duct injuries?
Early repair of bile duct injuries was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay and was concluded to be better than delayed repair, despite a slightly higher absolute number of 90-day mortalities.
Aim: To assess cases of pregnancy induced hypertension. Materials & Methods: Our study included 74 cases of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Parameters such as age, marital status, education, parity, etc., were recorded. Results: Age group (years) < 20 had 30%, 20-24 had 45%, 25-29 had 16%, 30-34 had 5% and >35 had 4% cases. Education level was illiterate in 40% and literate in 60%, and marital status was married in 58%, single in 26% and divorced in 16$, parity was 0 in 24%, 1-2 in 46% and >2 in 30%, gravida was primi in 40% and multi in 60%, previous PIH was seen in 24% patients. Family history of DM was observed in 25%, family history of PIH in 18%, family history of hypertension was seen in 10%, history of asthma was seen among in 8% and history of kidney disease 30% patients. The difference was significant (P< 0.05). Conclusion: Common risk factors of pregnancy induced hypertension was family history history of asthma, hypertension, family history of PIH, family history of DM, history of kidney disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khazaei et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Bile duct injury (n=64). Early repair vs. Delayed repair was evaluated on 90-day mortality (p=<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: